October 29th, 2012
sassational

Evolution is actually pretty predictable.

“Is evolution predictable? To a surprising extent the answer is ‘yes’,” says Princeton professor Peter Andolfatto.

New research by Andolfatto and colleagues published in the journal Science suggests that knowledge of a species’ genes—and how certain external conditions affect the proteins encoded by those genes—could be used to determine a predictable evolutionary pattern driven by outside factors.

Scientists could then pinpoint how the diversity of adaptations seen in the natural world developed even in distantly related animals.

The researchers carried out a survey of DNA sequences from 29 distantly related insect species, the largest sample of organisms yet examined for a single evolutionary trait. Fourteen of these species have evolved a nearly identical characteristic due to one external influence—they feed on plants that produce cardenolides, a class of steroid-like cardiotoxins that are a natural defense for plants such as milkweed and dogbane.

Though separated by 300 million years of evolution, these diverse insects—which include beetles, butterflies, and aphids—experienced changes to a key protein called sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase, or the sodium-potassium pump, which regulates a cell’s crucial sodium-to-potassium ratio.

Yep.

Reblogged from Neuroscience
  1. peculiaraura reblogged this from scinerds
  2. lethere reblogged this from ikenbot
  3. imaspicygirl reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  4. cleverwaysoflearning reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  5. canislytherintosherlocksbed reblogged this from christopherkreider
  6. christopherkreider reblogged this from scinerds
  7. chloehasalotoffeelings reblogged this from madgeneticist
  8. digg3r reblogged this from scinerds
  9. farawaymooncall reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  10. leadmetoinsanity reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  11. robintheghost reblogged this from neurosciencestuff
  12. future-microbiologist reblogged this from realfakescientist
  13. madgeneticist reblogged this from neurosciencestuff and added:
    I think the one big point in the paper that is missing is the idea that this ‘predictability’ comes down to the...
  14. itsshantitime reblogged this from realfakescientist
  15. eruditionanimaladoration reblogged this from realfakescientist
  16. realfakescientist reblogged this from scientificthought
  17. argentarachnids reblogged this from scinerds
  18. sylarsrden reblogged this from ikenbot
  19. glampersand reblogged this from scinerds
  20. lurkingshadow reblogged this from scinerds
  21. empathy-vs-apathy-nyc reblogged this from notesonsleeplessness
Loading tweets...

@_WordGirl

Likes

Sassational is the weblog repository of Andrea (Pegg) Eaken, aka "Sassy". Find me on Twitter, @_WordGirl. It's
fun being Creative Director
for Kinetic Consulting, too
(but the views expressed
here are wholly my own and are not those of my employer, cool?).

Somewhat Interesting Tidbits:
I am a gutsy critical thinker,
a passionate dance and yoga lover, exuberant (but not always successful) reverse-engineer in the kitchen, and proud Mom to my kiddo and
two kickass ocicats.

Networks